Public perceptions about low back pain and its management: a gap between expectations and reality?
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 3 (3) , 161-168
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00091.x
Abstract
To compare public perceptions and patient perceptions about back pain and its management with current clinical guidelines. A survey using a quota sampling technique. On-the-street in South Derbyshire in the UK. 507 members of the general population aged between 20 and 60 years, including a representative subsample of 40% who had experienced back pain in the previous year. To test knowledge and perceptions of back pain and its best management using statements based on The Back Book which was produced in conjunction with the Royal College of General Practitioners and based on best available evidence. In addition expectations of back pain management and outcome were investigated. Forty percent of this sample had experienced back pain during the previous year, more than half of whom had consulted their GP. More than half believed the spine is one of the strongest part of the body, but nearly two thirds incorrectly believed that back pain is often due to a slipped disc or trapped nerve. Two thirds expected a GP to be able to tell them exactly what was wrong with their back, although slightly fewer among those who had consulted. Most expected to have an X-ray, especially if they had consulted. Most recognised that the most important thing a GP can do is offer reassurance and advice. The responses were not related to age, gender or social class. Those who had consulted appeared to have slightly more misconceptions: this could be partly due to people with more severe problems or more misconceptions being more likely to consult, but also suggests either that GPs are still giving inaccurate information or at least failing to correct these misconceptions. The problem of managing back pain might be reduced by closing the gap between the public’s expectations and what is recommended in the guidelines through the promotion of appropriate health education messages. Further professional education of GPs also appears to be needed to update them in the most effective approach to managing back pain.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Instigators of activity intoleranceManual Therapy, 1997
- The Course of Back Pain in Primary CareSpine, 1996
- Acute low back pain: a new paradigm for managementBMJ, 1996
- General practitioners' management of acute back pain: a survey of reported practice compared with clinical guidelinesBMJ, 1996
- Expectations as Determinants of Patient Satisfaction: Concepts, Theory and EvidenceInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1995
- The Prognostic Consequences in the Making of the Initial Medical Diagnosis of Work-Related Back InjuriesSpine, 1995
- Back problems are for life: Perceived vulnerability and its implications for chronic disabilityJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 1994
- 1987 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences: A New Clinical Model for the Treatment of Low-Back PainSpine, 1987
- Incidence and risk factors of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc or sciatica leading to hospitalizationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- Patient Satisfaction with Medical Care for Low-Back PainSpine, 1986