The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 22 June 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Evolutionary Biology
- Vol. 22 (7) , 1367-1375
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01757.x
Abstract
Phylogenetic comparative methods are extremely commonly used in evolutionary biology. In this paper, I highlight some of the problems that are frequently encountered in comparative analyses and review how they can be fixed. In broad terms, the problems boil down to a lack of appreciation of the underlying assumptions of comparative methods, as well as problems with implementing methods in a manner akin to more familiar statistical approaches. I highlight that the advent of more flexible computing environments should improve matters and allow researchers greater scope to explore methods and data.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Space versus phylogeny: disentangling phylogenetic and spatial signals in comparative dataProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2008
- Relating Traits to Diversification: A Simple TestThe American Naturalist, 2008
- Parental conflict in birds: comparative analyses of offspring development, ecology and mating opportunitiesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007
- Detecting Non-Brownian Trait Evolution in Adaptive RadiationsPLoS Biology, 2006
- Comparative analyses of the influence of developmental mode on phenotypic diversification rates in shorebirdsProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Phenotypic plasticity in the scaling of avian basal metabolic rateProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Phylogenies and the Comparative Method: A General Approach to Incorporating Phylogenetic Information into the Analysis of Interspecific DataThe American Naturalist, 1997
- Seeking the Evolutionary Regression Coefficient: An Analysis of What Comparative Methods MeasureJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1993
- Comparative methods for explaining adaptationsNature, 1991
- Phylogenies and the Comparative MethodThe American Naturalist, 1985