Poststroke pain control by chronic motor cortex stimulation: neurological characteristics predicting a favorable response
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- Published by Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) in Journal of Neurosurgery
- Vol. 89 (4) , 585-591
- https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.89.4.0585
Abstract
Object. The goal of this study was to identify the neurological characteristics of patients with poststroke pain who show a favorable response to motor cortex (MC) stimulation used to control their pain. Methods. The neurological characteristics of 31 patients treated by MC stimulation were analyzed. In 15 patients (48%), excellent or good pain control (pain reduction > 60%) was achieved for follow-up periods of more than 2 years by using MC stimulation at intensities below the threshold for muscle contraction. Satisfactory pain control was achieved in 13 (73%) of 18 patients in whom motor weakness in the painful area was virtually absent or mild, but in only two (15%) of the 13 patients who demonstrated moderate or severe weakness in the painful area (p < 0.01). Muscle contraction was inducible in the painful area in 20 patients when stimulated at a higher intensity. No such muscle response was inducible in the remaining 11 patients, no matter how extensively the authors attempted to determine appropriate stimulation sites. Satisfactory pain control was achieved in 14 (70%) of the 20 patients in whom muscle contraction was inducible, but in only one (9%) of the 11 patients in whom muscle contraction was not inducible (p < 0.01). No significant relationship was observed between pain control and various sensory symptoms, including the presence of hypesthesia, spontaneous dysesthesia, hyperpathia, and allodynia, or the disappearance of the N20 component of the median nerve—evoked somatosensory scalp potential. No significant relationship existed between the effect of MC stimulation on the pain and stimulation-induced phenomena, including paresthesia, improvement in motor performance, and attenuation of involuntary movements. Conclusions. These findings suggest that the pain control afforded by MC stimulation requires neuronal circuits that are maintained by the presence of intact corticospinal tract neurons originating from the MC. Preoperative evaluation of motor weakness of the painful area appears to be useful for predicting a favorable response to MC stimulation in the control of poststroke pain.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- The management of central post-stroke painPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1995
- PARAESTHESIAS ARE ELICITED BY SINGLE PULSE, MAGNETIC COIL STIMULATION OF MOTOR CORTEX IN SUSCEPTIBLE HUMANSBrain, 1991
- Phantom limbs and the concept of a neuromatrixTrends in Neurosciences, 1990
- Thalamic Stimulation and Recording in Patients with Deafferentation and Central PainStereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 1989
- Electrical stimulation of the brain in treatment of chronic painJournal of Neurosurgery, 1985
- Deafferentation Pain and Stimulation of the Thalamic Sensory Relay Nucleus: Clinical and Experimental StudyStereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 1985
- Monopolar Electrical Stimulation of Nucleus ventroposteromedialis thalami for Postherpetic Facial PainStereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 1982
- Functional role of sensory inputs to the motor cortexProgress in Neurobiology, 1981
- Thalamic stimulation for neuropathic painJournal of Neurosurgery, 1980
- PAIN AFTER CORTICAL INJURY RELIEVED BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF THE INTERNAL CAPSULEBrain, 1974