On the Conceptual Disconfirmation of Theories
- 1 March 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 7 (1) , 131-137
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728171020
Abstract
The first author's concepts of operational and conceptual disconfirmability are revised on the basis of recent critiques appearing in this journal. Operational and conceptual disconfirmation can be conceived as alternative resolutions of the disconfirmation dilemma, which is the problem faced by a researcher when a theoretical prediction is empirically disconfirmed. Operational disconfirmation corresponds to the conclusion that the prediction failed because of invalid procedures, while conceptual disconfirmation corresponds to the conclusion that the theoretical analysis underlying the prediction was faulty. Social psychology may indeed differ from other disciplines in being more prone to the operational disconfirmation conclusion.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social Psychological Theory and FalsificationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981
- The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.American Psychologist, 1980
- Levels of Disconfirmability and Social Psychological Theory: A Response to GreenwaldPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1979
- Psychology and the American ideal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977
- Crucial Experiments and Social Psychological InquiryPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1976
- On the inconclusiveness of “crucial” cognitive tests of dissonance versus self-perception theoriesJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1975
- Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- Criticism and the Growth of KnowledgePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1970