Effect of different methods of maintenance on the development and morphology of Babesia bigemina in the gut of Boophilus microplus
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Research in Veterinary Science
- Vol. 40 (1) , 94-98
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-5288(18)30492-2
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Protozoology: Gamete fusion in Babesia?Nature, 1983
- Sexuality in piroplasms as revealed by electron microscopy in Babesia microti.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1983
- Biological Comparisons between a Laboratory-Maintained and a Recently Isolated Field Strain of Boophilus microplusJournal of Parasitology, 1982
- Penetration of the peritrophic membrane of the tick by Babesia microtiCell and tissue research, 1982
- Increased numbers of strahlenkorper in Boophilus microplus ticks ingesting a blood-passaged strain of Babesia bigeminaResearch in Veterinary Science, 1981
- Differences in the Life Cycles Between a Vaccine Strain and an Unmodified Strain of Babesia bovis (Babes, 1889) in the Tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini)*The Journal of Protozoology, 1978
- Preliminary observations on the ultrastructure of supposed sexual stages of Babesia bigemina (Piroplasmea)Zeitschrift Fur Parasitenkunde-Parasitology Research, 1977
- Survival of the parasitic protozoan, Babesia bigemina, in blood cooled at widely different rates to −196°CInternational Journal for Parasitology, 1974
- The life cycle of Babesia bigemina (Smith and Kilborne, 1893) in the tick vector Boophilus microplus (Canestrini)Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1964
- Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der PiroplasmenMedical Microbiology and Immunology, 1906