Citizenship in the Empowered Locality
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Affairs Quarterly
- Vol. 28 (1) , 69-103
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004208169202800104
Abstract
Although liberal and communitarian interpretations of citizenship differ profoundly, they nevertheless offer essentially similar prescriptions in support of empowered localities. The authors argue, instead, that the rejected alternative of consolidated government better promotes both interpretations of effective citizenship. They develop this argument by more fully specifying the behavioral implications of the two views of citizenship and theoretically linking those behaviors to fragmented and consolidated urban institutions using the Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect model introduced by Lyons and Lowery in 1986. They then test the central proposition derived from that analysis using a comparison group design.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Citizen Responses to Dissatisfaction in Urban Communities: A Partial Test of a General ModelThe Journal of Politics, 1989
- The Impact of Jurisdictional Boundaries: An Individual-Level Test of the Tiebout ModelThe Journal of Politics, 1989
- Liberal VirtuesAmerican Political Science Review, 1988
- Liberalism and the Communitarian CritiqueAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1987
- The Organization of Political Space and Citizen Responses to Dissatisfaction in Urban Communities: An Integrative ModelThe Journal of Politics, 1986
- Citizen-Demand Making in the Urban ContextAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1984
- Metropolis, Memory, and CitizenshipAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1981
- Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service DeliveryPublic Administration Review, 1980
- A Theory of Neighborhood Problem Solving: Political Action vs. Residential MobilityAmerican Political Science Review, 1972
- The City in the Future of DemocracyAmerican Political Science Review, 1967