Counting the Number of Parties: An Alternative Index
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 85 (4) , 1383-1391
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1963951
Abstract
I propose an alternative index to operationalize the variablenumber and size of partiesin a party system. To support it, I present a critical overview of the two most common indices, Laakso and Taagepera'seffective number of parties andKesselman and Wildgen'shyperfractionalization, showing the causes of their weakness. Then I explain the computational logic of my alternative, “number of parties,” and compare it with the other two, using hypothetical cases. After that, I contrast the Laakso-Taagepera index with mine, using data from actual elections between 1945 and 1981. I conclude that my index outperforms the other two as an operationalization of the variable number and size of parties.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Effective” Number of PartiesComparative Political Studies, 1979
- The Measurement of Party CompetitionAmerican Political Science Review, 1974
- The Measurement of HyperfractionalizationComparative Political Studies, 1971
- Party Systems and Government StabilityAmerican Political Science Review, 1971
- The Desired Political EntropyAmerican Political Science Review, 1969
- Party Systems and Patterns of Government in Western DemocraciesCanadian Journal Of Political Science-Revue Canadienne De Science Politique, 1968
- The Measurement of Inter-Party Competition and Systemic StabilityAmerican Political Science Review, 1967
- French Local Politics: A Statistical Examination of Grass Roots ConsensusAmerican Political Science Review, 1966
- A Mathematical Theory of CommunicationBell System Technical Journal, 1948
- National Power and the Structure of Foreign TradePublished by University of California Press ,1945