Antimicrobial Proficiency Testing of National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System Hospital Laboratories
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 24 (5) , 356-361
- https://doi.org/10.1086/502214
Abstract
Objective: : The National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System personnel report trends in antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. To validate select antimicrobial susceptibility testing results and to identify test methods that tend to produce errors, we conducted proficiency testing among NNIS System hospital laboratories.Setting: : NNIS System hospital laboratories in the United States.Methods: : Each laboratory received five organisms (ie, an imipenem-resistantSerratia marcescens,an oxacillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus,a vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faecalis,a vancomycin-intermediateStaphylococcus epidermidis,and an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESβL)-producingKlebsiella pneumoniae).Testing results were compared with reference testing results from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Results: : Of 138 laboratories testing imipenem against theSerratia marcescensstrain, 110 (80%) correctly reported minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) or zone sizes in the resistant range. All 193 participating laboratories correctly reported theStaphylococcus aureusstrain as oxacillin resistant. Of the 193 laboratories, 169 (88%) reported correct MICs or zone sizes for the vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faecalis.One hundred sixty-two (84%) of 193 laboratories demonstrated the ability to detect a vancomycin-intermediate strain ofStaphylococcus epidermidis;however, disk diffusion performed poorly when testing both staphylococci and enterococci with vancomycin. Although laboratory personnel correctly reported nonsusceptible extended-spectrum cephalosporins and aztreonam results forK. pneumoniae,only 98 (51%) of 193 correctly reported this organism as an ESβL producer.Conclusion: : Overall, NNIS System hospital laboratory personnel detected most emerging resistance patterns. Disk diffusion continues to be unreliable for vancomycin testing of staphylococci and must be used cautiously for enterococci. Further education on the processing of ESβL-producing organisms is warranted.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a Home Health-Care PatientEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Practical Strategies for Detecting and Confirming Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus : a Tertiary-Care Hospital Laboratory's ExperienceJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001
- Survey of Infections Due toStaphylococcusSpecies: Frequency of Occurrence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Isolates Collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific Region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997–1999Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Increasing Resistance to Vancomycin and Other Glycopeptides in Staphylococcus aureusEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Ability of Laboratories To Detect Emerging Antimicrobial Resistance: Proficiency Testing and Quality Control Results from the World Health Organization's External Quality Assurance System for Antimicrobial Susceptibility TestingJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001
- Vancomycin-Intermediate and -Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: What the Infectious Disease Specialist Needs to KnowClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Characterization of the Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Reference Strain, Klebsiella pneumoniae K6 (ATCC 700603), Which Produces the Novel Enzyme SHV-18Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2000
- Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections in United States Hospitals: A Three‐Year AnalysisClinical Infectious Diseases, 1999
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Key Bloodstream Bacterial Isolates: Electronic Surveillance with The Surveillance Network Database‐‐USAClinical Infectious Diseases, 1999
- The Emergence of Decreased Susceptibility to Vancomycin in Staphylococcus epidermidisInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1999