The Construction of the Hidden Curriculum: messages and meanings in the assessment of student learning
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Vol. 23 (4) , 391-402
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230406
Abstract
A wide range of diverse responses by individual students to innovative or alternative assessment are described and discussed, drawing on research data. Student perspectives are significant since assessment is a powerful factor in determining the hidden curriculum and assessment reform has frequently been proposed as a means of better aligning actual experience with the official curriculum. At a general level, students appeared to understand and adapt to new assessment requirements but case studies illustrate that students do not respond in a fixed nor simple way. Individuals are active in the reconstruction of the messages and meanings of assessment. Ostensibly the same assessment is interpreted differently not just by ‘staff and ‘students’ but by individuals. Students import a range of experiences, motivations and perspectives which influence their response. However, although the process is complex, insights gained can be helpful in better aligning the hidden and the formal curriculum.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Learning to Teach in Higher EducationPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2002
- “But is it fair?”: An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessmentStudies in Educational Evaluation, 1997
- Assessment 2000: Towards a Pluralistic Approach to AssessmentPublished by Springer Nature ,1996
- Contrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations: the student experience and its implicationsHigher Education, 1991
- Voice: the search for a feminist rhetoric for educational studies∗Cambridge Journal of Education, 1990
- Hidden curriculum in the universityHigher Education, 1987
- The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning.American Psychologist, 1984