Dissimilatory bacterial sulfate reduction in montana groundwaters
- 28 January 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Geomicrobiology Journal
- Vol. 2 (1) , 83-98
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01490458009377752
Abstract
The origin of hydrogen sulfide in southeastern Montana groundwaters was investigated. Sulfate‐reducing bacteria were detected in 25 of 26 groundwater samples in numbers ranging from 2.0 × 101 to greater than 2.4 × 104 bacteria per 100 ml. Stable sulfur isotope fractionation studies indicated a biological role in sulfate reduction. However, sulfate‐reducing activity as determined by use of a radioactive sulfur isotope was observed in only 1 of 16 samples. It is postulated that bacterial dissimilatory sulfate reduction is responsible for a major portion of the sulfide produced in these groundwaters and that these bacteria are most likely active in the adsorbed state, possibly in subsurface microzones where environmental conditions are conducive to sulfate reduction.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The origin of native sulphur deposits from isotope fractionation studiesPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Impact of western coal mining—II. Microbiological studiesWater Research, 1979
- How Bacteria StickScientific American, 1978
- Sulfate reduction and sulfur deposition in the Lower Fars Formation, northern IraqEconomic Geology, 1977
- Stable isotopes as a guide to biogeochemical processesProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1975
- Subsurface Biological Activity in Relation to Ground‐Water PollutionaGroundwater, 1975
- The distribution and isotopic abundance of sulphur in recent marine sediments off southern CaliforniaGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1963
- Fractionation of Sulfur and Carbon Isotopes in a Meromictic LakeScience, 1963
- Mechanism of the bacterial reduction of sulphate from isotope fractionation studiesTransactions of the Faraday Society, 1958
- NATURAL VARIATIONS IN THE ISOTOPIC CONTENT OF SULPHUR AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCECanadian Journal of Research, 1949