Identifying Prenatal Alcohol Use: Screening Instruments Versus Clinical Predictors
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The American Journal on Addictions
- Vol. 8 (2) , 87-93
- https://doi.org/10.1080/105504999305884
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of screening instruments with clinical predictors in the identification of prenatal alcohol use. 350 women initiating prenatal care at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA) completed the T‐ACE, AUDIT, and SMAST. The predictive accuracy of each was compared using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The T‐ACE, AUDIT, and clinical predictors alone correctly identified 65 to 70% of current drinkers, whereas the SMAST alone performed only slightly better than chance. The predictive ability of the T‐ACE was further improved with the addition of clinical predictors.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alcohol Use and Pregnancy: Improving IdentificationPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- Detecting risk drinking during pregnancy: a comparison of four screening questionnaires.American Journal of Public Health, 1996
- Timeline Follow-BackPublished by Springer Nature ,1992
- A Psychometric Evaluation of a Visual Analogue Scale of Craving for CigarettesWestern Journal of Nursing Research, 1990
- The T-ACE questions: Practical prenatal detection of risk-drinkingAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- Bootstrapping: Applications to PsychophysiologyPsychophysiology, 1989
- A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.Radiology, 1983
- A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and Cross-ValidationThe American Statistician, 1983
- The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 1982
- A self-administered Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST).Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1975