The influence of weaning regime on central testing station performance in pigs
- 1 October 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Animal Science
- Vol. 29 (2) , 203-212
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003356100023424
Abstract
To investigate possible pre-test environmental effects on testing station performance, pigs from a total of 107 litters from two breed types were weaned on one of three treatments: weaning at 3, 5 or 8 weeks of age, with a different creep-feeding regime on each. At 8 to 10 weeks of age, litter groups (usually consisting of two boars, one male castrate and one gilt) were sent to a Meat and Livestock Commission testing station and performance-tested from 27 to 85 kg live weight on twice daily to-appetite feeding.Weaning treatment significantly affected live weight at 50 days and boar growth rate and feed efficiency on test, but carcass traits were largely unaffected. Boars weaned on the 8-week treatment showed a significant advantage in index score of two-thirds of a standard deviation over those weaned at 3 weeks. A smaller number on the 5-week treatment were intermediate but did not differ significantly from those on the other two. It is concluded that wide variation in the weaning methods of herds sending pigs to a testing station could affect selection decisions. Ways of removing any bias by standardizing weaning methods or by statistical adjustment are discussed.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development of a synthetic pig sire line by selection with immigration 1. Results of selection and heritability estimatesAnimal Science, 1976
- An international comparison of pig breeds using a common control stockLivestock Production Science, 1975
- Retarded growth in hampshire pigletsLivestock Production Science, 1975
- The Influence of Prenatal and Postnatal Pretesting Environment on Pig Testing ResultsActa Agriculturae Scandinavica, 1964
- The early weaning of pigs VI. The effects of early weaning and of various growth curves before 50 lb. live weight upon subsequent performance and carcass qualityThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1959