Irrational Expectations
- 1 September 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Legal Theory
- Vol. 3 (3) , 227-248
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s135232520000077x
Abstract
Rational expectations models have become a staple of economic theory and the basis for a Nobel Prize. This article argues that rational expectations analysis suffers from potentially fatal flaws that seriously undermine its value in understanding many market phenomena. Using the example of financial markets, the article illustrates how the rational expectations approach has worked to obscure, rather than to illuminate, our understanding of speculation and speculative markets. This misguidance raises problems for law and policy.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Stock Markets Costly Casinos? Disagreement, Market Failure, and Securities RegulationVirginia Law Review, 1995
- Exactly What do You Mean by Speculation?The Journal of Portfolio Management, 1993
- Smart Money, Noise Trading and Stock Price BehaviourThe Review of Economic Studies, 1993
- Informed Speculation with Imperfect CompetitionThe Review of Economic Studies, 1989
- Price Destabilizing SpeculationJournal of Political Economy, 1986
- Divergence of Opinion in Complete Markets: A NoteThe Journal of Finance, 1985
- Why There Are Organized Futures MarketsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1981
- Heterogeneous Expectations, Restrictions on Short Sales, and Equilibrium Asset PricesThe Journal of Finance, 1980
- The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive ActivityPublished by Elsevier ,1978
- RISK, UNCERTAINTY, AND DIVERGENCE OF OPINIONThe Journal of Finance, 1977