Association of simple anthropometric measures of obesity with visceral fat and the metabolic syndrome in male Caucasian and Indo‐Asian subjects
- 24 November 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Diabetic Medicine
- Vol. 21 (12) , 1339-1345
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01361.x
Abstract
Aims The aims of this study were first, to investigate the relationship between simple anthropometric measures of obesity with visceral fat as assessed by a single slice magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐scan in patients attending a hospital clinic. Second, to determine which anthropometric measure best relates to the adverse metabolic profile of the metabolic syndrome. Methods Forty‐one male subjects [body mass index (BMI): 30.2 + 5.8 kg/m2, age: 50.3 + 13.6 years] were studied by MRI‐scan to measure visceral fat at L4/L5 level and to investigate its relationship with simple anthropometric measures. Second, we studied 83 male subjects to determine which anthropometric measure best predicts the metabolic complications (using the ATPIII criteria) of obesity in the setting of a hospital clinic. Results Waist circumference was the best anthropometric measurement that correlated with MRI‐visceral fat mass assessed at L4/L5 in 41 subjects who had an MRI scan (P = 0.0001, r2 = 0.36, beta = 0.56) amongst variables which also included age, BMI, sagittal diameter, diabetes and ethnicity. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed sagittal diameter (P = 0.001, r2 = 0.4, beta = 0.406), age (P = 0.003, beta = 0.271) and waist circumference (P = 0.012, beta = 0.297) were the best predictors of the adverse metabolic profile of the metabolic syndrome in all 83 male subjects amongst BMI, waist–hip ratio (WHR), ethnicity and diabetes‐related factors. Conclusions Waist circumference is a simple anthropometric parameter that best correlates with single slice MRI‐scan, but sagittal diameter (measured using abdominal calipers) better predicts the adverse metabolic profile of the metabolic syndrome. Although there is considerable variation in abdominal fat topography between ethnic groups, and also within populations, sagittal diameter assessment is a technique that is simple and best predicts the metabolic syndrome.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of Obesity and Hyperinsulinemia in the Development of Metabolic Syndrome: San Antonio Heart StudyObesity Research, 2002
- Predicting Incident Diabetes in Jamaica: The Role of AnthropometryObesity Research, 2002
- Regional Intra‐Subject Variability in Abdominal Adiposity Limits Usefulness of Computed TomographyObesity Research, 2002
- Anthropometric indexes in the prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia in a Mexican populationInternational Journal of Obesity, 2001
- Association between simple anthropometric indices and cardiovascular risk factorsInternational Journal of Obesity, 2001
- Body mass index and percent body fat: a meta analysis among different ethnic groupsInternational Journal of Obesity, 1998
- TrueInternational Journal of Obesity, 1998
- Predicting intra-abdominal fatness from anthropometric measures: the influence of statureInternational Journal of Obesity, 1997
- Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: Best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and womenThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1994
- Impact of obesity on metabolism in men and women. Importance of regional adipose tissue distribution.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1983