Using Principal‐Agent Theory to Deal with Output Slippage in the European Union Set‐Aside Policy
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Vol. 52 (2) , 29-41
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2001.tb04520.x
Abstract
This paper proposes modifications to the existing EU set‐aside policy which are designed to alleviate the problem of output slippage associated with heterogeneous land quality by using “incentive‐compatible” mechanisms drawn from principal‐agent theory. Specifically, it is suggested that there should be differential reference yields based on land quality to discourage the “adverse selection” of lower quality land for set‐aside, and that the scope of set‐aside monitoring should be expanded to include both the quantity and the quality of land set‐aside so as to discourage “moral hazard” problems. The potential of these modifications is illustrated using a numerical analysis, which is also used to evaluate the role of a range of factors which determine the set‐aside decision. Finally, an estimate of the “benefits” from reducing slippage required to justify the costs of including these modifications is provided.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk and Producer Compensation in the Agenda 2000 Cereal Reforms: A NoteJournal of Agricultural Economics, 2008
- An Assessment of the Impact of Implementing the European Commission's Agenda 2000 Cereal Proposals for Specialist Wheatgrowers in DenmarkJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1999
- PARTICIPATION IN SET ASIDE: WHAT DETERMINES THE OPTING IN PRICE?Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1996
- LAND HETEROGENEITY AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CAP SET‐ASIDEJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1996
- An incentive approach to land set-aside programsEuropean Economic Review, 1995
- On Testing the Structure of Risk Preferences in Agricultural Supply AnalysisAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1991
- Robustness of the Mean‐Variance Model with Truncated Probability DistributionsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1991