Wording, Meaning, and Linguistic Ideology
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Anthropologist
- Vol. 92 (2) , 346-361
- https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1990.92.2.02a00060
Abstract
Two seemingly disparate areas of English language structure—the grammar of reported speech and of textual cohesion—are functionally related in that both entail a distinction between “wording” and “meaning.” This is consistent with the Western ideological disjunction between language and reality, talk and action. Neither these language structures nor this linguistic ideology are found among the Ngarinyin people of northwestern Australia, suggesting a Whorfian hypothesis about their possible interrelationship.This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Direct speech and indirect speech: A functional studyPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2011
- Reported speech in DanishPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2011
- Reported speech in some languages of NepalPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2011
- Reported speech: Some general issuesPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2011
- The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about languagePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1993
- Meaningful Phonological Processes: A Consideration of Central Alaskan Yupik Eskimo ProsodyLanguage, 1987
- Structure and word order in Kalkatungu: The anatomy of a flat languageAustralian Journal of Linguistics, 1983
- On classifying anaphoric relations: A review of M. A. K. Halliday and R. Hasan, Cohesion in EnglishLingua, 1978
- Where Epistemology, Style, and Grammar Meet Literary History: The Development of Represented Speech and ThoughtNew Literary History, 1978
- The semantics of direct and indirect discoursePaper in Linguistics, 1974