The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers
- 8 May 1999
- Vol. 318 (7193) , 1224-1225
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1224
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uniform structured formats for scientific communications—how far should we go?Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1997
- Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1996
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statementJAMA, 1996
- Commentary: Scientific heads are not turned by rhetoricBMJ, 1995
- The rhetoric of researchBMJ, 1995
- Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association.1994
- The Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authorsThe Lancet, 1992
- A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature.1987