Barriers to low tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Survey development, validation, and results
- 1 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 35 (12) , 2747-2754
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000287591.09487.70
Abstract
To evaluate perceived attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors regarding the use of low tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome among physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists in intensive care units. Cross-sectional, self-administered survey. Large Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network teaching hospital in Baltimore, MD. Attending, fellow, and resident physicians; staff nurses; and respiratory therapists in three intensive care units. A survey was designed to assess barriers related to clinicians' perceived attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors related to low tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome and intensive care unit organization-related barriers. Survey development was guided by a published framework of barriers to clinician adherence to practice guidelines; individual items were derived through literature review and refined through pilot testing. Content validity, face validity, and ease of use were verified by local clinicians. Psychometric properties were assessed and regression analyses were conducted to examine differences in perceptions and knowledge level by provider discipline and training level. There were 291 completed surveys with a response rate of 84%. Validity and acceptable psychometric properties were demonstrated. Barriers related to clinician attitudes, behaviors, and intensive care unit organization were significantly higher among nurses and respiratory therapists vs. physicians. Knowledge-related barriers also were significantly higher among nurses vs. physicians and respiratory therapists. Barriers were lower and knowledge test scores higher among fellows and attending physicians vs. residents. Similarly, barriers were lower and knowledge test scores higher among nurses with >10 yrs of experience vs. <10 yrs of experience. Important organizational and clinician barriers, including knowledge deficits, regarding low tidal volume ventilation were reported, particularly among nurses and resident physicians. Addressing these barriers may be important for increasing implementation of low tidal volume ventilation.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Underuse of lung protective ventilation: Analysis of potential factors to explain physician behavior*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Ventilatory Management of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeJAMA, 2005
- High Tidal Volume and Positive Fluid Balance Are Associated With Worse Outcome in Acute Lung InjuryChest, 2005
- Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Lung InjuryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Struggle for implementation of new strategies in intensive care medicine: anticoagulation, insulin, and lower tidal volumesJournal of Critical Care, 2005
- Clinical implementation of the ARDS network protocol is associated with reduced hospital mortality compared with historical controls*Critical Care Medicine, 2005
- Ventilation of patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: Has new evidence changed clinical practice?*Critical Care Medicine, 2004
- Barriers to providing lung-protective ventilation to patients with acute lung injuryCritical Care Medicine, 2004
- The Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000