Reducing the Influence of Anecdotal Reasoning on People’s Health Care Decisions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Statistics?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 25 (4) , 398-405
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x05278931
Abstract
Background. People’s treatment decisions are often influenced by anecdotal rather than statistical information. This can lead to patients making decisions based on others’ experiences rather than on evidence-based medicine. Objective. To test whether the use of a quiz or pictograph decreases people’s reliance on anecdotal information. Design. Two cross-sectional survey studies using hypothetical scenarios. Participants read a scenario describing angina and indicated a preference for either bypass surgery or balloon angioplasty. The cure rate of both treatments was presented using prose, a pictograph, a quiz, or a pictograph and quiz combination. Participants read anecdotes from hypothetical patients who described the outcome of their treatment; the number of successful anecdotes was either representative or unrepresentative of the cure rates. Setting and Participants. Prospective jurors at the Philadelphia County Courthouse and travelers at the Detroit-Wayne County Metropolitan Airport. Measurements. Proportion of respondents preferring bypass over balloon angioplasty. Results. In study 1, when statistical information was presented in prose, treatment choices were influenced by anecdotes, with 41% of participants choosing bypass when the anecdotes were representative and only 20% choosing it when the anecdotes were unrepresentative (x2 = 14.40, P < 0.001). When statistics were reinforced with the pictograph and quiz, anecdotes had no significant influence on treatment decisions (38% choosing bypass when anecdotes were representative v. 44% when unrepresentative, x2 = 1.08, P > 0.20). In study 2, the tradeoff quiz did not reduce the impact of the anecdotes (27% v. 28% choosing bypass after receiving or not receiving the quiz, x2 < 1, P > 0.20). However, the pictograph significantly reduced the impact of anecdotes, with 27% choosing bypass after receiving no pictograph and 40% choosing bypass after receiving a pictograph (x2 = 6.44, P < 0.001). Conclusions. Presenting statistical information using a pictograph can reduce the undue influence of anecdotal reasoning on treatment choices.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Does It Mean to Understand a Risk? Evaluating Risk ComprehensionJNCI Monographs, 1999
- The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening MammographyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Explaining the Identifiable Victim EffectJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1997
- Social roles and strategies in prediction: Some determinants of the use of base-rate information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984
- The base-rate fallacy in probability judgmentsActa Psychologica, 1980
- The effects of base rates and individuating information on judgments about another personJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1980
- The Differential Impact of Abstract vs. Concrete Information on Decisions1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1977
- Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977
- Dominance of accuracy information and neglect of base rates in probability estimationActa Psychologica, 1976
- On the psychology of prediction.Psychological Review, 1973