Measurement of Health Preferences among Patients with Tuberculous Infection and Disease
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 22 (1_suppl) , 102-114
- https://doi.org/10.1177/027298902237706
Abstract
Health preferences have not previously been investigated among patients with tuberculous infection or disease. The authors assessed the reliability of visual analogue scale (VAS) and standard gamble (SG) measurements in this patient population. Participants were interviewed 3 times in English or French, at weekly intervals. They evaluated their own health status, as well as 3 marker health states, derived by consensus among tuberculosis (TB) practitioners. For the VAS, health states were assigned a duration of 6 months, whereas for the SG, the duration was 10 years. One hundred eighty-six potentially eligible individuals were identified from the TB clinic database of the Montreal Chest Institute. One hundred twelve (60%) were successfully located; of these, 106 were confirmed eligible. Sixty-seven (63%) agreed to participate, and 50 completed all study measurements (25 treated for latent TB, 17 treated for active TB, and 8 with previous active TB); 38 out of 50 were foreign-born. Intraclass correlation coefficients for the marker states were 0.57 to 0.81 for the VAS, and 0.75 to 0.87 for the SG. For respondents’ own health, the coefficients were 0.60 and 0.87, respectively. Median VAS scores for respondents’ own health were 85.0 to 88.0 for the 3 interviews, whereas the median utility score was 97.5 for all 3. Administration of the visual analogue scale and standard gamble instruments appeared reliable in a selected group of tuberculosis patients. Major barriers to recruitment were language and mobility in this largely foreign-born population.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Visual Analog Scales: Do They Have a Role in the Measurement of Preferences for Health States?Medical Decision Making, 2001
- What Should Be Reported in a Methods Section on Utility Assessment?Medical Decision Making, 2001
- Unstable Preferences:Medical Decision Making, 2000
- Patients' Utilities for Cancer TreatmentsMedical Decision Making, 1998
- Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: What lies behind the numbers?Social Science & Medicine, 1997
- Inconsistency and health state valuationsSocial Science & Medicine, 1996
- Methodological Issues of Patient Utility Measurement Experience From Two Clinical TrialsMedical Care, 1995
- Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelinesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Methodology for measuring health-state preferences—II: Scaling methodsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989
- The utility of different health states as perceived by the general publicJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1978