AMS 742 Sphincter: UCLA Experience
- 1 December 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 124 (6) , 812-814
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55680-3
Abstract
During an 11 mo. period, artificial sphincters were implanted in 2 female and 19 male patients for the treatment of urinary incontinence. Etiologies for incontinence varied, including post-prostatectomy incontinence, myelodysplasia and female incontinence after unsuccessful bladder neck suspension. Overall, 38% of the patients were excellent or improved postoperatively, while 24% experienced continuing unabated urinary incontinence and 24% experienced urethral erosion at the site of cuff placement. The device was removed in 14% of the patients when it became infected.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Urethral Compression Procedure for the Treatment of Male Urinary IncontinenceJournal of Urology, 1979
- Augmentation Enterocystoplasty: A Critical ReviewJournal of Urology, 1977