Do doctors read forms? A one-year audit of medical certificates submitted to a crematorium
Open Access
- 1 July 1998
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
- Vol. 91 (7) , 371-376
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689809100708
Abstract
To determine the thoroughness and accuracy with which medical certificates for cremation are completed, a record was made, during normal processing of the documents, of the number of questions that were not answered or answered wrongly, or in which clarification was required. Of 835 sets of forms only 346 (41 %) were completed sufficiently accurately for the cremation to proceed without further enquiry. Junior doctors contributed the most errors but general practitioners and consultants also contributed large numbers of errors. Doctors ought to be far more accurate and thorough in completing cremation certificates than were those audited here. The results cast doubt on the reliability of information supplied on other forms. In view of the high frequency of poorly completed forms, review by a medical referee remains essential.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Requesting necropsiesBMJ, 1997
- The coroner's necropsy in sudden death: an under-used source of epidemiological information.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1996
- What is old age?Public Health, 1996
- Accuracy of death certificate completion: the need for formalized physician training.1996
- Accuracy of Death Certificate CompletionJAMA, 1996
- Information on death certificates: cause for concern?Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1996
- Death certification after a diagnosis of presenile dementia.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1993
- Death certification by House Officers and General Practitioners — practice and performancePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1993
- Medical referee of a crematorium.BMJ, 1982
- Cremation regulations.BMJ, 1971