A Computer Simulation of the Paradox of Voting
- 1 June 1966
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 60 (2) , 384-390
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1953365
Abstract
This paper presents estimates of the probability that the occurrence of the Paradox of Voting, commonly known as Arrow's Paradox, will prevent the selection of a majority issue when odd-sized committees ofmjudges vote uponnissues. The estimates, obtained through computer simulation of the voting process, indicate that the probability of such an intransitive social ordering is lower than the ratio of intransitive outcomes to all outcomes.Many of the arguments in political theory and welfare economics dealing with the paradox (e.g., Downs, 1957; Black, 1958; Schubert, 1960) seem to have implicitly assumed that since the paradox exists, its likelihood of occurrence is very close to 1. The results in this paper may call for a re-examination of these positions.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Measure of the Importance of Cyclical MajoritiesThe Economic Journal, 1965
- CONDITIONS FOR THE “VOTING PARADOX” IN COMM1TTEE DEGISIONSMetroeconomica, 1965
- Voting and the Summation of Preferences: An interpretive Bibliographical Review of Selected Developments During the Last DecadeAmerican Political Science Review, 1961
- A Study of Irrational JudgmentsJournal of Political Economy, 1957
- A Probabilistic Theory of Consumer BehaviorThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956
- Intransitivity, Utility, and the Aggregation of Preference PatternsEconometrica, 1954