Workplace Industrial Relations under Different Regulatory Systems: A Survey‐Based Comparison of Australia and Britain
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Industrial Relations
- Vol. 32 (3) , 319-338
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1994.tb01007.x
Abstract
The focus of the paper is upon the extent to which different national regulatory systems give rise to different institutions and outcomes at the workplace. It uses data from the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey and the third British Workplace Industrial Relations Survey to examine a number of hypotheses which suggest that the different regulatory systems of these countries have produced distinct patterns of industrial relations at the workplace. It is concluded that, while there is substantial evidence that the countries' different regulatory systems have had distinct effect on industrial relations institutions and outcomes, these are not as straight forward as earlier work has suggested.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond Size and Sector: A View from OverseasJournal of Industrial Relations, 1991
- WAGE DETERMINATION: THE CHANGING ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS IN ADVANCED INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIESOxford Review of Economic Policy, 1990
- The Employment of Married Women in the United Kingdom 1970-83Economica, 1990
- Economics of Worldwide StagflationPublished by Harvard University Press ,1985
- Compulsory Arbitration and the Wage Structure in AustraliaJournal of Industrial Relations, 1980
- OCCUPATIONAL PAY STRUCTURES UNDER DIFFERENT WAGE FIXING ARRANGEMENTS: A COMPARISON OF INTRA‐OCCUPATIONAL PAY DISPERSION IN AUSTRALIA, GREAT BRITAIN AND THE UNITED STATES*British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1980
- The Wages of the Strong and the WeakJournal of Industrial Relations, 1973