The European Patent Office and the political economy of European intellectual property policy
- 1 September 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of European Public Policy
- Vol. 4 (3) , 388-403
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769780000061
Abstract
The article examines the European Patent Office and how the political economy of intellectual property policy helps to explain the observed sluggishness of European patent filing activity compared to the US and Japan. The analysis also focuses on intellectual property (IP) policy tensions regarding the protection versus the dissemination of IP. The article shows that the protection function of the European Patent Office (EPO) is driven increasingly by big business pressure (from European and US multinationals) to improve pendency rates and lower costs. On the other hand, regarding the dissemination function, the EPO and national patent offices are under greater pressure to enhance awareness of IP rights and IP knowledge to interests, such as small business, that are more dispersed and weak. The analysis further shows that the relations between the EPO and national offices exhibit a delicate balance between co-operation and competition, financial viability and fee sharing, and concerns about translation and the language of commerce and the survival of national offices.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: reflexive modernisation and the European UnionPolicy & Politics, 1996
- National Innovation SystemsPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1993
- Patenting of Biotechnology: GATT and the Erosion of the World’s BiodiversityJournal of World Trade, 1991
- Benefits and Costs of Intellectual Property Protection in Developing CountriesJournal of World Trade, 1990
- Patent Policy in an Open EconomyCanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 1982