A New Look at Screening and Diagnosing Diabetes Mellitus
Open Access
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by The Endocrine Society in Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Vol. 93 (7) , 2447-2453
- https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-2174
Abstract
Objective: Diabetes is underdiagnosed. About one third of people with diabetes do not know they have it, and the average lag between onset and diagnosis is 7 yr. This report reconsiders the criteria for diagnosing diabetes and recommends screening criteria to make case finding easier for clinicians and patients. Participants: R.M.B. invited experts in the area of diagnosis, monitoring, and management of diabetes to form a panel to review the literature and develop consensus regarding the screening and diagnosis of diabetes with particular reference to the use of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Participants met in open session and by E-mail thereafter. Metrika, Inc. sponsored the meeting. Evidence: A literature search was performed using standard search engines. Consensus Process: The panel heard each member’s discussion of the issues, reviewing evidence prior to drafting conclusions. Principal conclusions were agreed on, and then specific cut points were discussed in an iterative consensus process. Conclusions: The main factors in support of using HbA1c as a screening and diagnostic test include: 1) HbA1c does not require patients to be fasting; 2) HbA1c reflects longer-term glycemia than does plasma glucose; 3) HbA1c laboratory methods are now well standardized and reliable; and 4) errors caused by nonglycemic factors affecting HbA1c such as hemoglobinopathies are infrequent and can be minimized by confirming the diagnosis of diabetes with a plasma glucose (PG)-specific test. Specific recommendations include: 1) screening standards should be established that prompt further testing and closer follow-up, including fasting PG of 100 mg/dl or greater, random PG of 130 mg/dl or greater, or HbA1c greater than 6.0%; 2) HbA1c of 6.5–6.9% or greater, confirmed by a PG-specific test (fasting plasma glucose or oral glucose tolerance test), should establish the diagnosis of diabetes; and 3) HbA1c of 7% or greater, confirmed by another HbA1c- or a PG-specific test (fasting plasma glucose or oral glucose tolerance test) should establish the diagnosis of diabetes. The recommendations are offered for consideration of the clinical community and interested associations and societies.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Retinal Vascular Changes in Pre-Diabetes and PrehypertensionDiabetes Care, 2007
- Diabetes Epidemiology: Guiding Clinical and Public Health PracticeDiabetes Care, 2007
- The spectrum of neuropathy in diabetes and impaired glucose toleranceNeurology, 2003
- Hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia at diagnosis of diabetes and their association with subsequent cardiovascular disease in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 47)American Heart Journal, 1999
- Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetic Association diagnostic criteriaThe Lancet, 1999
- Isolated Postchallenge Hyperglycemia and the Risk of Fatal Cardiovascular Disease in Older Women and Men: The Rancho Bernardo StudyDiabetes Care, 1998
- Mortality from Coronary Heart Disease in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes and in Nondiabetic Subjects with and without Prior Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- The Onset of NIDDM and its Relationship to Clinical Diagnosis in Egyptian AdultsDiabetic Medicine, 1996
- Undiagnosed NIDDM: Clinical and Public Health IssuesDiabetes Care, 1993
- Onset of NIDDM occurs at Least 4–7 yr Before Clinical DiagnosisDiabetes Care, 1992