Improvements to the Red List Index
Open Access
- 3 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 2 (1) , e140
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000140
Abstract
The Red List Index uses information from the IUCN Red List to track trends in the projected overall extinction risk of sets of species. It has been widely recognised as an important component of the suite of indicators needed to measure progress towards the international target of significantly reducing the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. However, further application of the RLI (to non-avian taxa in particular) has revealed some shortcomings in the original formula and approach: It performs inappropriately when a value of zero is reached; RLI values are affected by the frequency of assessments; and newly evaluated species may introduce bias. Here we propose a revision to the formula, and recommend how it should be applied in order to overcome these shortcomings. Two additional advantages of the revisions are that assessment errors are not propagated through time, and the overall level extinction risk can be determined as well as trends in this over time.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards the global monitoring of biodiversity changeTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2006
- The value of the IUCN Red List for conservationPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- The Consistency of Extinction Risk Classification ProtocolsConservation Biology, 2005
- An index of intactnessNature, 2005
- Developing indicators for European birdsPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2005
- Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyondPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2005
- Biodiversity barometersNature, 2004
- Measuring Global Trends in the Status of Biodiversity: Red List Indices for BirdsPLoS Biology, 2004
- Protocols for listing threatened species can forecast extinctionEcology Letters, 2004
- Value of the IUCN Red ListTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2003