Evaluation of work-rest schedules with respect to the effects of postural workload in standing work
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 41 (12) , 1832-1844
- https://doi.org/10.1080/001401398186009
Abstract
The influence of four work-rest schedules (60-min shift-15-min break, 45-15, 30-15, 30-30) on acute effects of physical workload in the back and legs due to standing work was investigated in 12 poultry inspectors. Subjective discomfort in the legs and back, and swelling in the distal lower leg were significantly affected, with the 60-15 schedule leading to a higher postural load as compared with the other schedules. No effect on spinal shrinkage was found. It was concluded that the 60-15 schedule should be avoided. An optimal work-rest schedule considering visco-elastic deformation of the spine would probably involve frequent short breaks, whereas longer breaks would seem more effective considering leg swelling.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sustained Loading Generates Stress Concentrations in Lumbar Intervertebral DiscsSpine, 1996
- Estimation of spinal loads in overhead workErgonomics, 1994
- Physiological and spinal responses to circuit weight-trainingErgonomics, 1994
- Lower Limb Volume Measurements: Standardization and Reproducibility of an Adapted Optical Leg Volume MeterPhlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease, 1993
- An Improved Method of Stature Measurement for Quantitative Determination of Spinal LoadingSpine, 1992
- Effect of a weightlifting belt on spinal shrinkage.British Journal of Sports Medicine, 1991
- Evaluation of spinal loads and chair design in seated work tasksClinical Biomechanics, 1987
- Analysis of cumulative strain in tendons and tendon sheathsJournal of Biomechanics, 1987
- Endurance limit of force in long-term intermittent static contractions.Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 1977
- A Technique for Assessing Postural DiscomfortErgonomics, 1976