Income level and regional policies, underlying factors associated with unwarranted variations in conservative breast cancer surgery in Spain
Open Access
- 19 April 2011
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Cancer
- Vol. 11 (1) , 145
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-145
Abstract
Background: Geographical variations in medical practice are expected to be small when the evidence about the effectiveness and safety of a particular technology is abundant. This would be the case of the prescription of conservative surgery in breast cancer patients. In these cases, when variation is larger than expected by need, socioeconomic factors have been argued as an explanation. Objectives: Using an ecologic design, our study aims at describing the variability in the use of surgical conservative versus non-conservative treatment. Additionally, it seeks to establish whether the socioeconomic status of the healthcare area influences the use of one or the other technique. Methods: 81,868 mastectomies performed between 2002 and 2006 in 180 healthcare areas were studied. Standardized utilization rates of breast cancer conservative (CS) and non-conservative (NCS) procedures were estimated as well as the variation among areas, using small area statistics. Concentration curves and dominance tests were estimated to determine the impact of income and instruction levels in the healthcare area on surgery rates. Multilevel analyses were performed to determine the influence of regional policies. Results: Variation in the use of CS was massive (4-fold factor between the highest and the lowest rate) and larger than in the case of NCS (2-fold), whichever the age group. Healthcare areas with higher economic and instruction levels showed highest rates of CS, regardless of the age group, while areas with lower economic and educational levels yielded higher rates of NCS interventions. Living in a particular Autonomous Community (AC), explained a substantial part of the CS residual variance (up to a 60.5% in women 50 to 70). Conclusion: The place where a woman lives -income level and regional policies- explain the unexpectedly high variation found in utilization rates of conservative breast cancer surgery.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variations in locoregional therapy in postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer treated in different countriesBritish Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Is hospital discharge administrative data an appropriate source of information for cancer registries purposes? Some insights from four Spanish registriesBMC Health Services Research, 2010
- Breast-Conserving Surgery in Older Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer: Current Patterns of Treatment Across the United StatesJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2009
- Is there much variation in variation? Revisiting statistics of small area variation in health services researchBMC Health Services Research, 2009
- EUROCARE-4. Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995–1999. Results and commentaryEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2009
- A brief conceptual tutorial on multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: interpreting neighbourhood differences and the effect of neighbourhood characteristics on individual healthJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2005
- Mamografía y detección precoz del cáncer de mamaRevista Espanola de Salud Publica, 2005
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Study Comparing Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radical Mastectomy for Early Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Variations in breast carcinoma treatment in older medicare beneficiariesCancer, 2002
- Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC trial 10801European Journal Of Cancer, 1998