Test–retest changes on scholastic aptitude tests are not related to g
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Intelligence
- Vol. 34 (1) , 15-27
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.04.001
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Scholastic Assessment or g?Psychological Science, 2004
- A review of the worst performance rule: Evidence, theory, and alternative hypothesesIntelligence, 2003
- IQ, the worst performance rule, and Spearman's law: a reanalysis and extensionIntelligence, 2003
- IQ is related to the worst performance rule in a memory task involving childrenIntelligence, 2001
- The Natural History of Change to Intellectual Performance: Who Changes? How Much? Is it Meaningful?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1993
- The Milwaukee project: Preventing mental retardation in children at risk: By Howard L. Garber. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Retardation, 1988. Pp. xxx + 434Developmental Review, 1989
- Further studies of the Wonderlic Personnel Test as a brief measure of intelligence.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1988
- Long-term reliability of the Wonderlic Personnel Test.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983
- An economical method for the evaluation of general intelligence in adults.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1981
- Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1980