Institutional Effectiveness Using Scholarly Peer Assessments as Major Criteria
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Project MUSE in The Review of Higher Education
- Vol. 9 (1) , 67-82
- https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1985.0005
Abstract
Some characteristics a peer ranking system would need if it attempted to rank universities according to their institutional effectiveness are discussed. A review of past peer rankings is made and weaknesses of such rankings are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States.Published by JSTOR ,1983
- A Matter of University Leadership: Reorganizing the Biological Sciences at BerkeleyChange: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 1983
- Prestige Allocation in Astronomical Research: A Study of Dysfunctional AspectsThe Pacific Sociological Review, 1982
- A performance appraisal of undergraduate business educationHuman Resource Management, 1980
- Measuring Organizational Effectiveness in Institutions of Higher EducationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1978
- Reputational Ratings of Doctoral ProgramsScience, 1978
- A Research Replication: The Reputations of American Professional SchoolsChange: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 1974
- An Assessment of Quality in Graduate EducationPhysics Today, 1966
- Graduate Study and Research in the Arts and Sciences at the University of PennsylvaniaBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 1961
- A Further Statistical Study of American Men of ScienceScience, 1910