Receiver Operating Characteristics Analyses of Food and Drug Administration-Cleared Serological Assays for Natural Rubber Latex-Specific Immunoglobulin E Antibody
Open Access
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
- Vol. 8 (6) , 1145-1149
- https://doi.org/10.1128/cdli.8.6.1145-1149.2001
Abstract
Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of Food and Drug Administration (510K)-cleared natural rubber latex (NRL)-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody immunoassays have not been performed using well-characterized skin-testing reagents. Sera were collected from 311 subjects (131 latex puncture skin test [PST] positive and 180 PST negative). All masked, coded sera were analyzed for latex-specific IgE antibodies in the Diagnostic Products Corporation microplate AlaSTAT, HYCOR HY-TEC RAST, and Pharmacia-Upjohn CAP System RAST FEIA (CAP). Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using GraphRoc for Windows software to construct and analyze ROC curves in relation to the subjects' PST status and the results of the immunoassays. The ROC areas under the curve (AUCs) ± standard error based on PST for the three diagnostic tests were 0.858 ± 0.024, 0.869 ± 0.024, and 0.924 ± 0.017, respectively, for AlaSTAT, CAP, and HY-TEC. The HY-TEC system had a significantly greater AUC based on PST than those observed for AlaSTAT ( P < 0.05) and CAP ( P < 0.05) analyses. When the diagnostic tests were probed as to the cutoffs giving maximal diagnostic efficiency compared to PST, CAP and AlaSTAT yielded values of A )/liter and <0.35 kU/liter while the HY-TEC assay yielded 0.11 kU/liter. The diagnostic efficiencies based on PST in our cohort at these cutoffs were 87.1, 88.1, and 88.7%, respectively. The HY-TEC assay had a significantly greater AUC than CAP and AlaSTAT using PST as a diagnostic discriminator in our cohort. When the HY-TEC system was probed at its maximally efficient cutoff (0.11 kU/liter) versus HYCOR's recommended cutoff of 0.05 kU/liter, a loss of sensitivity of 8.4% was observed with a gain in specificity of 19.5%.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevalence of latex allergy may be vastly overestimated when determined by in vitro assaysAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2000
- Natural Rubber Latex:Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2000
- Diagnostic performance of Food and Drug Administration–cleared serologic assays for natural rubber latex–specific IgE antibodyJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1999
- Diagnosis of natural rubber latex allergy: Multicenter latex skin testing efficacy studyJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1998
- Impact of biologic variation on latex allergenicityJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1998
- Natural rubber latex skin testing reagents: Safety and diagnostic accuracy of nonammoniated latex, ammoniated latex, and latex rubber glove extractsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1996
- The prevalence of anti-latex IgE antibodies in 1000 volunteer blood donorsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1996
- Prevalence of Latex Sensitization among Hospital Physicians Occupationally Exposed to Latex GlovesAnesthesiology, 1992
- Latex Allergy: Another Occupational Risk for PhysiciansAllergy and Asthma Proceedings, 1992
- Basic principles of ROC analysisSeminars in Nuclear Medicine, 1978