Consequences of Creating New Kingdoms of Organisms
- 1 May 1983
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in BioScience
- Vol. 33 (5) , 314-318
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1309318
Abstract
Numerous taxonomic-nomenclatural problems arise when more than two kingdoms of eukaryotic organisms are recognized. The current international codes of botanical and zoological nomenclature are inadequate, especially for a kingdom Protista that embraces many groups of species conventionally considered (“mini”) plants or animals, but which definitely are not. Should the two codes be modified, united, or replaced by separate ones for every major kingdom proposed and accepted? Another problem discussed is the (unnecessary) proliferation of new names for redefined or reshuffled high-level taxa.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Kingdoms, Codes and ClassificationKew Bulletin, 1982
- How Many Kingdoms? Current Views of Biological ClassificationThe American Biology Teacher, 1981
- ArchaebacteriaScientific American, 1981
- What are the taxonomic and evolutionary relationships of the protozoa to the protista?Biosystems, 1981
- A Newly Revised Classification of the Protozoa*The Journal of Protozoology, 1980
- REMARKS ON ALGAL NOMENCLATURE VITaxon, 1980
- IV. HOW MANY ARE THE KINGDOMS OF ORGANISMS?Taxon, 1974
- Common Sense and Courtesy in Nomenclatural TaxaonomySystematic Zoology, 1972
- The Kingdoms of OrganismsSystematic Zoology, 1971
- Thallophytes and Kingdoms: A CritiqueKew Bulletin, 1971