Comparison of Linear Gain and Wide Dynamic Range Compression Hearing Aid Circuits II: Aided Loudness Measures
- 1 February 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Ear & Hearing
- Vol. 21 (1) , 32-44
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200002000-00007
Abstract
The goal of this study was to test the theoretical advantages of a single-channel wide dynamic range compression (WDRC) circuit fitted using the DSL method for increased dynamic range and normalized loudness growth. Ten adolescents and young adults with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss were fitted monaurally with the Siemens Viva 2 Pro behind-the-ear instrument set to DSL 4.0 targets for both linear gain and WDRC processing. Threshold, upper limit of comfort and loudness growth were measured in the unaided, linear gain and WDRC conditions for warble tones, environmental sounds and speech. Twelve adult listeners with normal hearing also were tested monaurally in the unaided condition to provide normative data for comparison purposes. The WDRC hearing aid provided a greater input dynamic range than the linear circuit for all stimuli. The dynamic range was normalized for more subjects with the WDRC than the linear hearing aid. In addition, exponential loudness growth functions fitted to the loudness growth data showed that, on average, loudness growth was more normalized with the WDRC hearing aid fitted to DSL[i/o] targets than the linear hearing aid fitted to DSL[i/o] targets. WDRC processing, fitted using the DSL[i/o] method, has potential applications in hearing aid fittings for listeners with moderate to severe hearing loss because it provides an audible, comfortable and tolerable amplified signal across a wider range of inputs than linear gain processing, without the need for volume control adjustments.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Linear Gain and Wide Dynamic Range Compression Hearing Aid Circuits: Aided Speech Perception MeasuresEar & Hearing, 1999
- Tutorial Compression? Yes, But for Low or High Frequencies, for Low or High Intensities, and with What Response Times?Ear & Hearing, 1996
- Updating Our Fitting Strategies Given New TechnologyAmerican Journal of Audiology, 1996
- Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Hearing Loss and their Implications for the Design of Hearing AidsEar & Hearing, 1996
- Amplification for Infants and Children With Hearing LossAmerican Journal of Audiology, 1996
- Compression Amplification in Hearing AidsAmerican Journal of Audiology, 1994
- Procedure for Predicting Real-Ear Hearing Aid Performance in Young ChildrenAmerican Journal of Audiology, 1994
- Evaluation of a Dual-Channel Full Dynamic Range Compression System for People with Sensorineural Hearing LossEar & Hearing, 1992
- A Comparison of Two-Channel and Single-Channel Compression Hearing Aids: Comparaison de prothèses acoustiques avec compression à un et deux canauxInternational Journal of Audiology, 1986
- Transformed Up-Down Methods in PsychoacousticsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1971