A trial bank model for the publication of clinical trials.
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- p. 863-7
Abstract
Clinical trials constitute one of the main sources of medical knowledge, yet trial reports are difficult to find, read, and apply to clinical care. Reasons for these difficulties include the lack of a common, standardized, structure for trial reports; the restricted length of reports; and limited computer support for use of the literature. We propose a new model of reporting clinical trials, in which trials are published as both prose commentary and as data in electronic "trial banks." The prose will allow authors to discuss their trials in writing; the electronic database will allow readers easy access to well-defined data about the trials. We are developing a formal conceptual model of the clinical trials domain for integrating the use of multiple trial banks. We will then focus on validating this conceptual model with clinical literature users.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reporting randomized controlled trials. An experiment and a call for responses from readersPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINEJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1994
- Systematic Reviews: Reporting, updating, and correcting systematic reviews of the effects of health careBMJ, 1994
- The benefits of aspirin in acute myocardial infarction. Still a well-kept secret in the United States.1994
- Evidence-Based MedicineJAMA, 1992
- Directory of registries of clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Electronic Data Publishing and GenBankScience, 1991
- More Informative Abstracts RevisitedAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1990
- Identification of meta-analysesControlled Clinical Trials, 1990
- Biostatistics: how to detect, correct and prevent errors in the medical literature.Circulation, 1980