Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms: Results from a Multicenter Clinical Trial
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 267 (3) , 858-868
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13120099
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED; ev3/Covidien, Irvine, Calif) in the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms. Materials and Methods: The Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms is a multicenter, prospective, interventional, single-arm trial of PED for the treatment of uncoilable or failed aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. Institutional review board approval of the HIPAA-compliant study protocol was obtained from each center. After providing informed consent, 108 patients with recently unruptured large and giant wide-necked aneurysms were enrolled in the study. The primary effectiveness endpoint was angiographic evaluation that demonstrated complete aneurysm occlusion and absence of major stenosis at 180 days. The primary safety endpoint was occurrence of major ipsilateral stroke or neurologic death at 180 days. Results: PED placement was technically successful in 107 of 108 patients (99.1%). Mean aneurysm size was 18.2 mm; 22 aneurysms (20.4%) were giant (>25 mm). Of the 106 aneurysms, 78 met the study's primary effectiveness endpoint (73.6%; 95% posterior probability interval: 64.4%81.0%). Six of the 107 patients in the safety cohort experienced a major ipsilateral stroke or neurologic death (5.6%; 95% posterior probability interval: 2.6%-11.7%). Conclusion: PED offers a reasonably safe and effective treatment of large or giant intracranial internal carotid artery aneurysms, demonstrated by high rates of complete aneurysm occlusion and low rates of adverse neurologic events; even in aneurysms failing previous alternative treatments.This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of bioactive coils and bare platinum coils for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a matched-pair analysisJournal of Neurosurgery, 2010
- Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-upThe Lancet Neurology, 2009
- Retreatment of Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms in Patients Randomized by Coiling or Clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT)Stroke, 2007
- Cerebral AneurysmsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Natural History and Clinical Management. Update on the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial AneurysmsNeuroimaging Clinics Of North America, 2006
- International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusionThe Lancet, 2005
- Indications for treatment of cerebral aneurysms from an endovascular perspective: the creation of an evidence base for interventional techniquesNeurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2005
- Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatmentThe Lancet, 2003
- Long-Term Angiographic Recurrences After Selective Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms With Detachable CoilsStroke, 2003
- International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomized trialJournal Of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2002