Clinical Efficacy and Safety of the New Cardioverter Defibrillator Systems
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 16 (1) , 153-158
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01553.x
Abstract
Clinical efficacy and safety of two new third‐generation implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) were studied in 38 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). There were 31 patients with coronary disease, three patients with right ventricular dysplasia, one patient with dilated cardiomyopathy, and three patients with valvular disease. Twenty‐four patients (group I) received an ICD with monophasic (Ventak PRx 1700, CPI) and 14 patients (group II) with biphasic shocks (Cadence V 100, Ventritex). Intraoperatively, the mean defibrillation threshold was significantly lower in group II than in group I, both in patients with induced VT (group I 11.0 ± 6.3 joules: group N 5.8 ± 1.3 joules) (P < O.01) and induced VF (group I 17.5 ± 4.6 joules; group II 9.6 ± 5.2 joules) (P < O.O1). During the mean follow‐up of 12 ± 7 months four patients (11%) died. 865 arrhythmia events (AE) occurred and were terminated by ATP (671 VTs, 78%). Acceleration of VTs was observed in 28 AE (3%) and ATP was unable to interrupt 58 AE (7%). ICD shocks were delivered as a first therapy in 108 AE (13%).Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Survival after implantation of the cardioverter defibrillatorThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Long-term outcome with the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Termination of Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias with an Implanted Automatic Defibrillator in Human BeingsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980