A Comparison of Multiport and Uniport Epidural Catheters in Laboring Patients
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 84 (6) , 1276-1279
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199706000-00019
Abstract
The relative incidence of technical difficulties associated with multiport (three lateral ports) and uniport (single distal port) epidural catheters remains controversial. As part of a continuing institutional evaluation of epidural catheter insertion, 500 parturients were randomized to have either a multiport or a uniport epidural catheter inserted 6 cm into the epidural space. Multiport epidural catheters were associated with inadequate analgesia less often and required manipulation less often than uniport epidural catheters. The incidences of intravenous cannulation, subsequent catheter dislodgement, and catheter replacement were similar for each catheter type. No multiport epidural catheter was associated with multicompartment placement. We conclude that multiport epidural catheters are preferable for use in laboring patients since they reduce the incidence of inadequate epidural analgesia.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Misplacement of multihole epidural catheters‐a report of two casesAnaesthesia, 1996
- Prospective Examination of Epidural Catheter InsertionAnesthesiology, 1996
- COMPARISON OF COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH SINGLE-HOLED AND MULTI-HOLED EXTRADURAL CATHETERSBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1990
- A comparison between open‐end (single hole) and closed‐end (three lateral holes) epidural cathetersAnaesthesia, 1989
- Differential flow from multihole epidural cathetersAnaesthesia, 1988
- Epidural catheters of the multi‐orifice type: dangers and complicationsActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1986
- A Hazard of Double-orifice Epidural CathetersAnesthesiology, 1978
- A new catheter for continuous extradural analgesiaAnaesthesia, 1962