Evaluation of 12 Commercial Tests and the Complement Fixation Test for Mycoplasma pneumoniae -Specific Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM Antibodies, with PCR Used as the “Gold Standard”
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 43 (5) , 2277-2285
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.43.5.2277-2285.2005
Abstract
Serology and nucleic acid amplification are the main diagnostic tools for the diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Since no reference standard is generally accepted, serologic assays for M. pneumoniae have not been evaluated on a broad scale. In this study, 12 commercially available serologic assays (for immunoglobulin G [IgG] and IgM) and the complement fixation test (CFT) were evaluated by using M. pneumoniae DNA detection by real-time PCR as the “gold standard.” The assays tested were Platelia EIA (Bio-Rad), SeroMP EIA (Savyon), Serion classic EIA (Virion/Serion), Biotest EIA (Biotest), Ridascreen EIA (r-Biopharm), AniLabsystems EIA (Labsystems), Novum EIA (Novum Diagnostica), Diagnosys EIA (MP products), Genzyme/Virotech EIA, ImmunoWell EIA (Genbio), ImmunoCard EIA (Meridian), and SerodiaMycoII microparticle agglutination (Fujirebio). Serum samples ( n = 46) from 27 PCR-positive patients with a known first day of disease and sera ( n = 33) from PCR-negative controls were obtained from prospective studies of acute lower respiratory tract infections. Additionally, control sera ( n = 63) from patients with acute viral or bacterial respiratory infections other than those caused by M. pneumoniae were tested. The results showed low specificities for both the Novum and the ImmunoCard IgM assays. The IgM assays with the best performances in terms of sensitivity and specificity were AniLabsystems (77% and 92%, respectively), SeroMP (71% and 88%, respectively), and CFT (65% and 97%, respectively). Good receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve were found for CFT (0.94), the Platelia assay (0.87), and the AniLabsystems assay (0.85). We conclude that there are few commercial serologic assays for the detection of M. pneumoniae infections with appropriate performances in terms of sensitivity and specificity and that PCR has become increasingly important for the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infections in defined groups of patients.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Molecular Diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae Respiratory Tract InfectionsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Molecular Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Adults with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Requiring HospitalizationJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001
- Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Children with Acute Respiratory Infection in General Practices in The NetherlandsScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Evaluation of Meridian ImmunoCard Mycoplasma Test for the Detection of Mycoplasma Pneumoniae-specific IgM in Paediatric PatientsScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Mycoplasma pneumoniae Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Review of 101 Hospitalized Adult PatientsRespiration, 1996
- 16S rRNA based polymerase chain reaction compared with culture and serological methods for diagnosis ofMycoplasma pneumoniae infectionEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1994
- Polyradiculopathy Due to Cytomegalovirus: Report of Two Cases in Which Improvement Occurred After Prolonged Therapy and Review of the LiteratureClinical Infectious Diseases, 1993
- Intrapartum Transmission of Group A StreptococcusClinical Infectious Diseases, 1993
- The limitations of IgM assays in the serological diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infectionsJournal of Medical Microbiology, 1990
- Diagnosis ofMycoplasma pneumoniae infection by microparticle aggluination and antibody-capture enzyme-immunoassayEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1990