Bone Repair and Enhancement Clinical Trial Design
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 355S, S336-S346
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199810001-00033
Abstract
Spine fusion represents over half of all current bone grafting procedures. It is an important clinical area for bone augmentation because use even of the most successful graft material, autogenous iliac crest bone, is fraught with an unacceptably high failure rate. Various new options that biologically will control bone induction currently are under development. To prevent unnecessary clinical failures, it is important that surgeons understand the principles of clinical trial design, whether they actively are using the reported results or simply reviewing them in an effort to decide if they will use the new technology in their own practice. This review highlights the important issues relevant to designing a clinical trial for studying the efficacy of a bone augmentation product in a spine application. Some of the design challenges are generic, but others are unique to the spine because of difficulty in defining a clear diagnostic group, difficulty in noninvasively assessing the technical success of surgery, and frequent dissociation of the clinical and radiographic results.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- 1997 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical StudiesSpine, 1997
- Complications of Iliac Crest Bone Graft HarvestingClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1996
- Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvest Donor Site MorbiditySpine, 1995
- The Role of Fusion and Instrumentation in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis with Spinal StenosisJournal of Spinal Disorders, 1993
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic EvaluationMedical Care, 1990
- Bone Morphogenetic ProteinsProgress in Growth Factor Research, 1989
- The practical and ethical defects of surgical randomised prospective trials.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1983
- A Study of the Natural History of Back PainSpine, 1983
- Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample?BMJ, 1980