Crop Production During Conversion from Conventional to Low‐Input Methods

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
A 5‐yr cropping system experiment was initiated in 1981 to study transition from a conventional agricultural system using pesticides and fertilizers to a low‐input system. The site was primarily Comly silt loam (fine‐loamy, mixed, mesic, Typic Fragiudalf) with 12% Berks shaly silt loam (loamy‐skeletal, mixed, mesic, Typic Dystrochrept), and a small area of Duffield silt loam (fine‐loamy, mixed, mesic, Ultic Hapludalf), in Berks County, eastern Pennsylvania. Three 5‐yr rotations were compared. A conventional corn (Zea mays L.)‐soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation (designated “conventional”) was compared to two low‐input rotations which utilized oat (Avena sativa L.), red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), in addition to corn and soybean. One low‐input rotation used cattle manure as a nutrient source and produced forage crops in addition to cash crops (designated “low‐input/livestock”), while the other used legume crops as a nutrient source, and produced a cash crop every year (designated “low‐input/cash grain”). Corn grain yields in the low‐input systems were 75% of conventional in 1981 to 1984, but yields were not significantly different in 1985. Weed competition and insufficient N limited low‐input corn yields during the first 4 yr. Soybean yields in the low‐input systems were equal to or greater than conventional all 5 yr. It is concluded that a favorable transition from input‐intensive cropping to low‐input systems is feasible, but only if crop rotations are used which include crops that demand less N and are competitive with weeds, such as small grain, soybean, or legume hay. Corn should be avoided for the first 3 to 4 yr.

This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit: