Rectification of the EMG Signal Impairs the Identification of Oscillatory Input to the Muscle
- 1 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 103 (2) , 1093-1103
- https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00792.2009
Abstract
Rectification of EMG signals is a common processing step used when performing electroencephalographic–electromyographic (EEG–EMG) coherence and EMG–EMG coherence. It is well known, however, that EMG rectification alters the power spectrum of the recorded EMG signal (interference EMG). The purpose of this study was to determine whether rectification of the EMG signal influences the capability of capturing the oscillatory input to a single EMG signal and the common oscillations between two EMG signals. Several EMG signals were reconstructed from experimentally recorded EMG signals from the surface of the first dorsal interosseus muscle and were manipulated to have an oscillatory input or common input (for pairs of reconstructed EMG signals) at various frequency bands (in Hz: 0–12, 12–30, 30–50, 50–100, 100–150, 150–200, 200–250, 250–300, and 300–400), one at a time. The absolute integral and normalized integral of power, peak power, and peak coherence (for pairs of EMG signals) were quantified from each frequency band. The power spectrum of the interference EMG accurately detected the changes to the oscillatory input to the reconstructed EMG signal, whereas the power spectrum of the rectified EMG did not. Similarly, the EMG–EMG coherence between two interference EMG signals accurately detected the common input to the pairs of reconstructed EMG signals, whereas the EMG–EMG coherence between two rectified EMG signals did not. The frequency band from 12 to 30 Hz in the power spectrum of the rectified EMG and the EMG–EMG coherence between two rectified signals was influenced by the input from 100 to 150 Hz but not from the input from 12 to 30 Hz. The study concludes that the power spectrum of the EMG and EMG–EMG coherence should be performed on interference EMG signals and not on rectified EMG signals because rectification impairs the identification of the oscillatory input to a single EMG signal and the common oscillatory input between two EMG signals.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Removal of visual feedback alters muscle activity and reduces force variability during constant isometric contractionsExperimental Brain Research, 2009
- Low-Alcohol Doses Reduce Common 10- to 15-Hz Input to Bilateral Leg Muscles During Quiet StandingJournal of Neurophysiology, 2008
- BOLD correlates of EMG spectral density in cortical myoclonus: Description of method and case reportNeuroImage, 2006
- Coherence at 16-32 Hz Can Be Caused by Short-Term Synchrony of Motor UnitsJournal of Neurophysiology, 2005
- Coupling of Oscillatory Activity Between Muscles Is Strikingly Reduced in a Deafferented Subject Compared With Normal ControlsJournal of Neurophysiology, 2004
- Patterns of EMG–EMG coherence in limb dystoniaMovement Disorders, 2004
- Coherence analysis in the myoclonus of corticobasal degenerationMovement Disorders, 2003
- Multiple Features of Motor-Unit Activity Influence Force Fluctuations During Isometric ContractionsJournal of Neurophysiology, 2003
- Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processingNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2001
- Ramification Pattern of Intermetacarpal Branches of the Deep Branch (Ramus profundus) of the Ulnar Nerve in the Human HandCells Tissues Organs, 1991