Building the national health information infrastructure for personal health, health care services, public health, and research
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 6 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Vol. 3 (1) , 1
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-3-1
Abstract
Improving health in our nation requires strengthening four major domains of the health care system: personal health management, health care delivery, public health, and health-related research. Many avoidable shortcomings in the health sector that result in poor quality are due to inaccessible data, information, and knowledge. A national health information infrastructure (NHII) offers the connectivity and knowledge management essential to correct these shortcomings. Better health and a better health system are within our reach. A national health information infrastructure for the United States should address the needs of personal health management, health care delivery, public health, and research. It should also address relevant global dimensions (e.g., standards for sharing data and knowledge across national boundaries). The public and private sectors will need to collaborate to build a robust national health information infrastructure, essentially a 'paperless' health care system, for the United States. The federal government should assume leadership for assuring a national health information infrastructure as recommended by the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics and the President's Information Technology Advisory Committee. Progress is needed in the areas of funding, incentives, standards, and continued refinement of a privacy (i.e., confidentiality and security) framework to facilitate personal identification for health purposes. Particular attention should be paid to NHII leadership and change management challenges. A national health information infrastructure is a necessary step for improved health in the U.S. It will require a concerted, collaborative effort by both public and private sectors. If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it. Lord KelvinKeywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Getting more for their dollar: a comparison of the NHS with California's Kaiser Permanente Commentary: Funding is not the only factor Commentary: Same price, better care Commentary: Competition made them do itBMJ, 2002
- Medical Privacy and Medical Research — Judging the New Federal RegulationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The Effect of the New Federal Medical-Privacy Rule on ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Geography And The Debate Over Medicare ReformHealth Affairs, 2002
- AogasComhar, 2002
- A National Agenda for Public Health Informatics: Summarized Recommendations from the 2001 AMIA Spring CongressJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2001
- Toward a New Culture for Biomedical Informatics: Report of the 2001 ACMI SymposiumJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2001
- A Computerized Reminder System to Increase the Use of Preventive Care for Hospitalized PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Advanced Technology Program's Information Infrastructure for Healthcare Focused Program: A Brief HistoryJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2000
- Counterpoint. Your privacy or your health - will medical privacy legislation stop quality health care?International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2000