IS AGE IMPORTANT? TESTING A GENERAL VERSUS A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR*
- 1 February 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Criminology
- Vol. 35 (1) , 13-48
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1997.tb00869.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- ARE SOME PEOPLE CRIME‐PRONE? REPLICATIONS OF THE PERSONALITY‐CRIME RELATIONSHIP ACROSS COUNTRIES, GENDERS, RACES, AND METHODS*Criminology, 1994
- TWO ROUTES TO DELINQUENCY: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EARLY AND LATE STARTERS IN THE IMPACT OF PARENTING AND DEVIANT PEERS*Criminology, 1994
- The interaction of age with the correlates and causes of crimeJournal of Quantitative Criminology, 1993
- Unraveling girls' delinquency: Biological, dispositional, and contextual contributions to adolescent misbehavior.Developmental Psychology, 1993
- COMPARING CRIMINAL CAREER MODELSCriminology, 1992
- A LATENT TRAIT APPROACH TO UNIFYING CRIMINAL CAREERS *Criminology, 1990
- Self-reported delinquency: Results from an instrument for New ZealandAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 1988
- Age, Crime, and the Early Life CourseAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1988
- TWO EMPIRICAL REGULARITIES (MAYBE) IN SEARCH OF AN EXPLANATION: COMMENTARY ON THE AGE/CRIME DEBATECriminology, 1988
- Age and the Explanation of CrimeAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1983