Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD: a multicenter randomized trial
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Gastroenterology
- Vol. 125 (6) , 1606-1612
- https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.08.034
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- IntroductionGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1999
- Unsedated small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus conventional EGD: A comparative studyGastroenterology, 1999
- Prospective evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: feasibility and study on performance and toleranceGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1999
- Identification of factors that influence tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopyEuropean Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 1999
- A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial of Sedation vs. No Sedation in Outpatient Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal EndoscopyEndoscopy, 1998
- A double‐blind randomized trial of low‐dose versus high‐dose topical anaesthesia in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopyAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1996
- A comparative study of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGDGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1996
- Topical Pharyngeal Anesthesia Improves Tolerance of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized Double-Blind StudyEndoscopy, 1995
- Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1991
- Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey.Gut, 1991