PREDICT modeling and in‐silico screening for G‐protein coupled receptors
- 29 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Vol. 57 (1) , 51-86
- https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20195
Abstract
G‐protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a major group of drug targets for which only one x‐ray structure is known (the nondrugable rhodopsin), limiting the application of structure‐based drug discovery to GPCRs. In this paper we present the details of PREDICT, a new algorithmic approach for modeling the 3D structure of GPCRs without relying on homology to rhodopsin. PREDICT, which focuses on the transmembrane domain of GPCRs, starts from the primary sequence of the receptor, simultaneously optimizing multiple ‘decoy’ conformations of the protein in order to find its most stable structure, culminating in a virtual receptor‐ligand complex. In this paper we present a comprehensive analysis of three PREDICT models for the dopamine D2, neurokinin NK1, and neuropeptide Y Y1 receptors. A shorter discussion of the CCR3 receptor model is also included. All models were found to be in good agreement with a large body of experimental data. The quality of the PREDICT models, at least for drug discovery purposes, was evaluated by their successful utilization in in‐silico screening. Virtual screening using all three PREDICT models yielded enrichment factors 9‐fold to 44‐fold better than random screening. Namely, the PREDICT models can be used to identify active small‐molecule ligands embedded in large compound libraries with an efficiency comparable to that obtained using crystal structures for non‐GPCR targets. Proteins 2004.Keywords
This publication has 172 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: application to complete genomes11Edited by F. CohenJournal of Molecular Biology, 2001
- An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. II. On the relationship between sequence and structural similarity for proteins that are not obviously related in sequenceJournal of Molecular Biology, 2000
- An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. I. Protein structural alignment and a quantitative measure for protein structural distanceJournal of Molecular Biology, 2000
- An alpha-carbon template for the transmembrane helices in the rhodopsin family of G-protein-coupled receptors 1 1Edited by R. HuberJournal of Molecular Biology, 1997
- Energy Functions that Discriminate X-ray and Near-native Folds from Well-constructed DecoysJournal of Molecular Biology, 1996
- Residue – Residue Potentials with a Favorable Contact Pair Term and an Unfavorable High Packing Density Term, for Simulation and ThreadingJournal of Molecular Biology, 1996
- Comparative Protein Modelling by Satisfaction of Spatial RestraintsJournal of Molecular Biology, 1993
- Control of topology and mode of assembly of a polytopic membrane protein by positively charged residuesNature, 1989
- Intrahelical hydrogen bonding of serine, threonine and cysteine residues within α-helices and its relevance to membrane-bound proteinsJournal of Molecular Biology, 1984
- CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculationsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 1983