Memory of a Speaker's Voice: Reaction Time to Same- or Different-voiced Letters
Open Access
- 1 February 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 26 (1) , 1-7
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14640747408400381
Abstract
Subjects were presented with a sequence of two letters, each letter spoken in either a male or female voice. On each trial, the subject was required to indicate, as quickly as possible, whether the two letters had the same name. Reaction times (RTs) were faster for letters spoken in the same voice for both “same” and “different” responses, even when letters were separated by 8 s. These results are incompatible with the notion of physical and name codes in auditory memory since a “different” response should always be based on a comparison of letter names and should not be influenced by voice quality. It was also found that RTs were not influenced by the phonemic distinctive feature similarity of the letters.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distinctive feature control of decision time: Same-different judgments of simultaneously heard phonemesPerception & Psychophysics, 1972
- Improved recall for digits with delayed recall cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- Distinctive features and response latency: A pilot studyPerception & Psychophysics, 1969
- Memory While ShadowingQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- Retention of visual and name codes of single letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control ProcessesPsychology of Learning and Motivation, 1968
- Decay of Visual Information from a Single LetterScience, 1967
- Rehearsal and decay in immediate recall of visually and aurally presented items.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1966
- An Association between Memory Errors and Errors due to Acoustic Masking of SpeechNature, 1962
- The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954