Measurement of Midfemoral Shaft Geometry: Repeatability and Accuracy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 16 (12) , 2251-2259
- https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.12.2251
Abstract
Although macroscopic geometric architecture is an important determinant of bone strength, there is limited published information relating to the validation of the techniques used in its measurement. This study describes new techniques for assessing geometry at the midfemur using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and examines both the repeatability and the accuracy of these and previously described DXA methods. Contiguous transverse MRI (Philips 1.5T) scans of the middle one-third femur were made in 13 subjects, 3 subjects with osteoporosis. Midpoint values for total width (TW), cortical width (CW), total cross-sectional area (TCSA), cortical cross-sectional area (CCSA), and volumes from reconstructed three-dimensional (3D) images (total volume [TV] and cortical volume [CVol]) were derived. Midpoint TW and CW also were determined using DXA (Lunar V3.6, lumbar software) by visual and automated edge detection analysis. Repeatability was assessed on scans made on two occasions and then analyzed twice by two independent observers (blinded), with intra- and interobserver repeatability expressed as the CV (CV ± SD). Accuracy was examined by comparing MRI and DXA measurements of venison bone (and Perspex phantom for MRI), against “gold standard” measures made by vernier caliper (width), photographic image digitization (area) and water displacement (volume). Agreement between methods was analyzed using mean differences (MD ± SD%). MRI CVs ranged from 0.5 ± 0.5% (TV) to 3.1 ± 3.1% (CW) for intraobserver and 0.55 ± 0.5% (TV) to 3.6 ± 3.6% (CW) for interobserver repeatability. DXA results ranged from 1.6 ± 1.5% (TW) to 4.4 ± 4.5% (CW) for intraobserver and 3.8 ± 3.8% (TW) to 8.3 ± 8.1% (CW) for interobserver variation. MRI accuracy was excellent for TV (3.3 ± 6.4%), CVol (3.5 ± 4.0%), TCSA (1.8 ± 2.6%), and CCSA (1.6 ± 4.2%) but not TW (4.1 ± 1.4%) or CW (16.4 ± 14.9%). DXA results were TW (6.8 ± 2.7%) and CW (16.4 ± 17.0%). MRI measures of geometric parameters of the midfemur are highly accurate and repeatable, even in osteoporosis. Both MRI and DXA techniques have limited value in determining cortical width. MRI may prove valuable in the assessment of surface-specific bone accrual and resorption responses to disease, therapy, and variations in mechanical loading.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Age at menarche and cortical bone geometry in premenopausal womenBone, 1999
- Site-Specific Effects of Strength Training on Bone Structure and Geometry of Ultradistal Radius in Postmenopausal WomenJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1999
- Moderate Exercise During Growth in Prepubertal Boys: Changes in Bone Mass, Size, Volumetric Density, and Bone Strength: A Controlled Prospective StudyJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1998
- Comparison of different models for interpreting bone mineral density measurements using DXA and MRI technologyBone, 1995
- Non‐circular geometry and radiogrammetry of the second metacarpalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1995
- Role of trabecular morphology in the etiology of age-related vertebral fracturesCalcified Tissue International, 1993
- Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1988
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Non-invasive measurement of long bone cross-sectional moment of inertia by photon absorptiometryJournal of Biomechanics, 1984
- The relationships among physical, geometrical and mechanical properties of bone, with a note on the properties of nonhuman primate boneAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1980