Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers for Treating Essential Hypertension
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 148 (1) , 16-29
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-1-200801010-00189
Abstract
Background: The relative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for lowering blood pressure is unknown. Purpose: To compare the benefits and harms of ACE inhibitors versus ARBs for treating essential hypertension in adults. Data Sources: MEDLINE (1966 to May 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2, 2006), and selected reference lists were searched for relevant English-language trials. The MEDLINE search was updated to August 2007 to identify head-to-head trials that reported blood pressure outcomes and major cardiovascular events. Study Selection: 61 clinical studies that directly compared ACE inhibitors versus ARBs in adult patients with essential hypertension, reported an outcome of interest, lasted at least 12 weeks, and included at least 20 patients. Data Extraction: A standardized protocol with predefined criteria was used to extract data on study design, interventions, population characteristics, and outcomes; evaluate study quality and applicability; and assess the strength of the body of evidence for key outcomes. Data Synthesis: ACE inhibitors and ARBs had similar long-term effects on blood pressure (50 studies; strength of evidence, high). No consistent differential effects were observed for other outcomes (few studies reported long-term outcomes), including death, cardiovascular events, quality of life, rate of single antihypertensive agent use, lipid levels, progression to diabetes, left ventricular mass or function, and kidney disease. Consistent fair- to good-quality evidence showed that ACE inhibitors were associated with a greater risk for cough. There were fewer withdrawals due to adverse events and greater persistence with therapy for ARBs than for ACE inhibitors, although this evidence was not definitive. Patient subgroups for whom ACE inhibitors or ARBs were more effective, associated with fewer adverse events, or better tolerated were not identified. Limitations: Few studies involved a representative sample treated in a typical clinical setting over a long duration, treatment protocols had marked heterogeneity, and substantive amounts of data about important outcomes and patient subgroups were missing. Conclusion: Available evidence shows that ACE inhibitors and ARBs have similar effects on blood pressure control, and that ACE inhibitors have higher rates of cough than ARBs. Data regarding other outcomes are limited.Keywords
This publication has 83 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reduction in Arterial Stiffness With Angiotensin II Antagonism and Converting Enzyme InhibitionA Comparative Study Among Malay Hypertensive Subjects With a Known Genetic ProfileAmerican Journal of Hypertension, 2007
- Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta‐analytical methods with rare eventsStatistics in Medicine, 2006
- A Multicenter, 14-Week Study of Telmisartan and Ramipril in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension Using Ambulatory Blood Pressure MonitoringAmerican Journal of Hypertension, 2006
- Differences in antihypertensive drug persistence associated with drug class and gender: a PHARMO studyPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2005
- The comparative effects of telmisartan and ramipril on P-wave dispersion in hypertensive patients: A randomized clinical studyClinical Cardiology, 2005
- Effects of valsartan and perindopril combination therapy on left ventricular hypertrophy and aortic arterial stiffness in patients with essential hypertensionEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2005
- Effects of valsartan compared with enalapril on blood pressure and cognitive function in elderly patients with essential hypertensionEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2004
- Effects of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist candesartan, compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, on the urinary excretion of albumin and type IV collagen in patients with diabetic nephropathyClinical and Experimental Nephrology, 2003
- The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood PressureThe JNC 7 ReportJAMA, 2003
- Efficacy and tolerability of losartan versus enalapril alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertensionClinical Therapeutics, 1995