Selves, Diverse and Divided: Can Feminists Have Diversity without Multiplicity?
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Hypatia
- Vol. 10 (4) , 1-31
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb00996.x
Abstract
I explore connections between social divisions and diversity within the self, while striving to differentiate internal diversity and multiplicity. When the person is understood as composite or multiple, she is seen as divided into several distinct agent-like aspects. This view is found in ancient, modem, and postmodern philosophy, psychology, poetry, and lay people's accounts of their experience. I argue for a conception of the self as diverse but not composite or multiple.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Was George Herbert Mead a Feminist?Hypatia, 1993
- Personal Autonomy or the Deconstructed Subject? A Reply to HekmanHypatia, 1992
- Male Lesbians and the Postmodernist BodyHypatia, 1992
- On Borderlands/La Frontera: An Interpretive EssayHypatia, 1992
- Multiplying Subjects and the Diffusion of PowerThe Journal of Philosophy, 1991
- The Importance of What We Care AboutPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1988
- A manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980sAustralian Feminist Studies, 1987
- Playfulness, “World”-Travelling, and Loving PerceptionHypatia, 1987
- The affirmative action debate and conflicting conceptions of individualityWomen's Studies International Forum, 1984
- Feminine masochism and the politics of personal transformationWomen's Studies International Forum, 1984